Skip to content
Home / Guides / Set Rollout Phases

Guides

Set Rollout Phases

Phased rollouts help legal teams learn new routines without stopping live work. For South African firms, that usually means careful sequencing across templates, matters, users and evidence handling.

Set Rollout Phases

Map the first release around the matters already moving

Start with the work that is already active in the firm, not the wish list on a whiteboard. A rollout plan works better when it follows current matters, current file structures and the people who carry most of the daily load in Sandton, Johannesburg or any other office.

Choose one or two matter types for the first phase, then keep the rest in view for later. If your team handles commercial disputes, collections or conveyancing, the first release should reflect the files that create the most admin pressure, because that is where cleaner routing and document assembly are felt fastest.

  • List the matter types that move through the firm every week.
  • Note which teams touch those matters from opening to close.
  • Mark any folders, templates or approvals that create delays.
  • Leave low-volume work for later phases, not the first cut.

Split the rollout into stable steps, not one long switch

A phased rollout is easier to govern when each stage has a clear start and a clear end. One phase can cover template builds, another can handle matter pipelines, then permissions, then evidence imports, and only after that do you move into wider user training. That order keeps the team from learning too many changes at once.

For firms with offices in Pretoria, Cape Town or Durban, a staggered move also helps local admins test their own routines before the full firm is live. That matters when files are shared across locations and people depend on the same naming rules, task queues and security settings.

  • Phase 1: design and test templates.
  • Phase 2: configure matter stages and status rules.
  • Phase 3: set access permissions and user groups.
  • Phase 4: import evidence and review queues.
  • Phase 5: train users, then move to controlled go live.

Tie each phase to one owner and one sign-off point

Every step needs a person who can make decisions and a person who checks the result. That avoids drift, especially when operations, legal teams and security reviews are all involved. A clear owner also prevents small issues from sitting in a queue until the week of go-live, which is when people least want surprises.

The legal-tech team should keep the handover notes plain. If a template field is renamed, or a workflow step is added, record it in language that the admin team can use later. Good rollout notes are short, specific and easy to follow during a busy month end.

  • Nominate one business owner for each phase.
  • Keep one technical owner for configuration decisions.
  • Ask for sign-off on templates, permissions and data mapping.
  • Record open issues before moving to the next stage.

Prepare data migration before the live routines begin

Data migration is safer when the team knows exactly what is moving and what is staying behind. Shared drives often hold duplicate versions, unfinished drafts and old evidence bundles, so the clean-up has to happen before the import. If the firm works under POPIA-aware controls, the access review needs to happen in the same phase, not later.

Evidence imports deserve extra care because the files are often large, mixed in format and spread across several locations. A staged import lets the team check file names, dates, matter links and review tags without rushing through the process. That lowers the chance of cluttered queues and makes the first live week less messy.

  • Remove duplicates and stale drafts before import.
  • Confirm matter codes, client names and file naming rules.
  • Check who can view sensitive bundles and review notes.
  • Test a sample import before the full load starts.

Train users by role, not by blanket sessions

Different teams need different training. Attorneys need to understand how matters move, paralegals need to see how documents are assembled, and firm operations need the full view of permissions, reporting and admin steps. A single general session is rarely enough, because people forget the pieces that do not match their daily work.

Short role-based sessions work well when the process is close to the work itself. Let users practise the exact tasks they will perform, then note the steps that still feel awkward. There is always one person who wants a shortcut, and that is usually where a missing rule shows up.

  • Run separate sessions for attorneys, support staff and admins.
  • Use real matter examples, not abstract screen tours.
  • Include document assembly, task movement and search routines.
  • Repeat the key controls for access and evidence handling.

Use go live support to watch the first real files closely

The first live files reveal whether the rollout plan matches the way the firm works. Watch how people open matters, file documents, assign tasks and find evidence. Small adjustments in naming, permissions or review queues are normal, because real teams often work one step differently from the notes on paper.

After go live, set a short review cycle for the first batch of users and matters. That review should cover what slowed people down, where the workflow felt unclear and which templates still need tightening. It is better to make a few clean changes early than to let a small issue spread across every matter.

  • Check that users can reach the right matters and files.
  • Confirm task assignments match the intended workflow.
  • Review template output for formatting and field accuracy.
  • Record issues, then assign the next fix point.

Keep the rollout steady after the first wave

A phased rollout is not finished when the first group is live. The next step is to review what worked, what needed a patch and where the next office or matter type should enter the system. That steady pace helps firms in Bloemfontein, Centurion or Rosebank add users without upsetting the controls already in place.

The strongest follow-up plans include health checks, incident response steps and a simple schedule for template updates. Once the early phase settles, the firm can widen the rollout with less pressure on support teams and a clearer view of what needs to change. A careful rollout saves effort later, even if it feels slower at the start.

  • Review the first phase before opening the next one.
  • Track template requests, access changes and data fixes.
  • Keep support notes with the live setup record.
  • Adjust the rollout order if the firm’s workload changes.

Questions we get asked

How many rollout phases make sense for a law firm?

Most firms do better with three to five phases, depending on how many matter types, offices and user groups need to move across. The right sequence is the one that keeps live work stable while people learn the new routines.

Should templates be built before user training?

Yes, because users need to see the actual document flow before they practise it. When templates are ready first, training becomes more concrete and the team can work with real examples instead of rough mock-ups.

What should be checked before go live?

Check matter codes, permissions, template output, evidence imports and the search paths people use every day. It is also wise to confirm that security settings and POPIA-related access controls match the firm’s internal rules.

Send Law Machines a message

Contact form